Caribou Barbie Puts the Twit into Twitter, So Let’s Smack Her Facebook

Just when I was feeling hopeful that
she had gone away, Caribou Barbie (Alaska Governor-Quit Sarah Palin, of
course) comes back in spades. Apparently, the reason she quit as governor was
because it was difficult to lie her ass off with the press hanging on every
word. I can imagine how difficult it must be to be the governor of a small state and
a former vice presidential candidate and swimsuit model, and still stay
anonymous. It's quite the challenge.


So, she quit her
job, ostensibly so that she could keep all that "lawyerin' money" and do
scintillating speeches before groups of wingnuts who didn't disagree with her
and who, in fact, were willing to pay good money to sit in an audience and
fantasize about doing her. Much easier, dontcha know.


So, now she lies on
the Facebook, and promotes her lies by the Twitterin', you betcha. This is a
note she put up on Facebook yesterday:


on the Current Health Care Debate


more Americans delve into the disturbing details of the nationalized health
care plan that the current administration is rushing through Congress, our
collective jaw is dropping, and we’re saying not just no, but hell no!


Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of
health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government
health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost.
And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and
the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my
parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s
“death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of
their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health
care. Such a system is downright evil.


care by definition involves life and death decisions. Human rights and human
dignity must be at the center of any health care discussion.


Michele Bachmann highlighted the Orwellian thinking of the president’s health
care advisor, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of the White House chief of
staff, in a floor speech to the House of Representatives. I commend her for
being a voice for the most precious members of our society, our children and
our seniors.


must step up and engage in this most crucial debate. Nationalizing our health
care system is a point of no return for government interference in the lives of
its citizens. If we go down this path, there will be no turning back. Ronald
Reagan once wrote, “Government programs, once launched, never disappear.
Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever
see on this earth.” Let’s stop and think and make our voices heard before it’s
too late.


Sarah Palin


Ok, when someone mentions Michele
Bachmann (I really have to bring back the Right Boob of the Week) and Orwellian in the same sentence, and Orwellian is not an adjective, you
know you're in for a bit of the crazy. This is easily the most clueless set of
lies ever uttered by a national politician. It not only shows a willingness to
lie in order to kill a bill that would prevent people from dying because they
have no money, which is immoral enough, but it shows such a profound ignorance
about the subject that the lies almost seem superfluous. Almost. But hey; this
is Caribou Barbie we're talking about here.


Here is the
misinformation, in a nutshell; and I do mean "nut."

  • There is no "nationalized health care" in this
    bill.  None. Zero. Nothing in the
    health care delivery system will change one bit, and all this reform bill
    adds is a public insurance OPTION. The word "option" is there
    for a reason, Barbie; NO ONE will have to give up their current insurance
    plan, if they choose to keep it. And nothing in the bill even touches the
    health care delivery system, except to promise that the public insurance
    system will negotiate prices, in order to save people money. Private
    insurance companies do that all of the time, by the way.
  • This health care reform is in
    no way "rushed." It took six months and countless hearings and
    meetings to write the bill in the first place, and by the time the final version of the bill
    is passed — and it had better be passed, or a lot of Blue Dog Democrats
    and most Republicans will be looking at the end of their careers in the
    wake of it — the bill will have been in the hands of Congresscritters and their massive staffs for
    at least a couple of months. I would also note that it's been 15 years
    since the last reform was tried. That's hardly a "rush."
  • Thomas Sowell is absolutely
    wrong, and he knows it; unlike the wingnuts who hang onto his every word as if he as the only "economist" in existence, Sowell's not stupid. He's a panderer, however. Covering everyone will reduce the cost of health
    care overall, and he knows it. And it will especially reduce the cost of health insurance for everyone. In order to believe
    that costs will not go down, you have to be a mathematically challenged
    dolt. Imagine, if you will, that you belong to a group of 100 people, all of whom make the same amount of money in a year. Now, suppose the cost of health care
    in that group over the next year will be $200,000, or $2,000 per
    person. Now, imagine if 20 of those 100 people were FORBIDDEN from
    paying into the health care pool. The cost of the health is still $200,000, but now, the cost to
    everyone paying into the pool is $2,500. That's just basic math, folks. Plus, the 20 people who are
    forbidden from going to a doctor now because they can't afford it, will
    have to wait until their condition gets chronic. What if ONE of them is
    pushed into an ER for emergency treatment, and that ends up costing your
    group $50,000. Suddenly, the cost to your 100-person group is $250,000. But only 80 people are paying. So, assuming no profit, the insurance for
    those 80 people is now  $3125. That
    is how our system works, and it's just plain ridiculous.You can assume that at least 25-30% of your health insurance bill is going to pay for people without insurance and without an ability to pay. Therefore, just covering everyone, and paying every bill, will reduce costs to those currently insured by 25-30%.
  • There is absolutely ZERO
    health care rationing in the health care reform bill. None. In fact, there
    is less rationing in the proposed public insurance system than is
    currently happening thoughout the private insurance system.  Apparently, Caribou Barbie has never
    heard the words "you're denied" from her health insurance
    company, and never had a doctor's decision overturned by an insurance
    company because his or her choice is deemed "too expensive."
    There is far less rationing in Medicare than in private insurance, and
    this bill is essentially an extension of Medicare. Plus, think about this a moment; you've paid upwards of $150,000 to your insurance plan for the last 20 years in your job. Then you lose your job. If you don't have the money to keep up the COBRA, and you happen to get sick, you might as well have pissed $150,000 (plus the interest they made on that money; more like $350,000 after 20 years) down the drain, because you get ZERO health care for that money. That's not "rationing?"
  • The most outrageous LIE in all of this (and yes, Caribou
    Barbie, I am calling you a liar; NO ONE could be this goddamned ignorant
    and still be able to feed herself) is the one in which she claims a
    "death panel" is created. No, Governor-Quit Palin, we do NOT
    want the undercoating. If anyone in government seems to be in favor of
    killing old people and the disabled, Barbie, it would seem to be your
    side. And I don't mean Republicans; I mean right wing nutjobs. YOUR PARTY
    was shamed into creating a prescription drug benefit for Medicare, and
    they created a donut hole in it so large a truck could drive through
    it, meaning Seniors are often left with a choice of food or medicine.  But the health care reform bill
    doesn't create anything resembling a "death panel," and no one
    will be put to death because of this bill. What the bill does create is a benefit in which end of life planning can be done, and the
    government health insurance plan will pay for it. IF YOU WANT IT. Doctors
    already often do this sort of thing out of the goodness of their hearts;
    now, they'll be paid for it.

Seriously, folks;
how much more of this woman — and I use the term loosely — can we take? No
one likes Caribou Barbie, except right wing idiots who imagine a three-way with
her and Ann Coulter; why do we always have to listen to her? And why is she so dim
as to think she can get away with these lies?


Ok, that last one
was a silly question from me. Look at who she's talking to…


I think I need more


Caribou Barbie Puts the Twit into Twitter, So Let’s Smack Her Facebook — 2 Comments

  1. This site is about facts, but it’s also about having fun and calling these people out for what they are. The title of the site should give away that this is not an academic site.
    Look; I’ve been doing this sort of thing for 20 years, and there’s a place for both Thom Hartmann and Stephanie Miller in the debate. What I do doesn’t drag anything down; there is no dialogue with these people, and the sooner progressives understand that, the better we’ll all be. One of the reasons we have not been able to advance our agenda, which is because we’ve been polite to people who don’t deserve it. When Sarah Palin starts discussing issues seriously, she will become Miss Palin. Until then, she’s Caribou Barbie, and will always be so. Ann Coulter’s entire CAREER is spent denegrating people and creating caricatures. If you think she’s anything but a caricature herself, then I’m sorry, you’re wrong.
    I was listening to a progressive talker the other morning, and I heard the CBS NEWS reader refer to what’s happening at the town halls as “debate.” It’s not “debate.” These people don’t engage in “debate.” They engage in vitriol and they lie. They don’t deserve even the modicum of respect you ask for. Plus, you’re expecting me to treat them the same as REAL conservatives, who have arguments to present that simply disagree with mine. That won’t happen, because it serves to elevate the idiots like Caribou Barbie and Coulter to the same level as George Will, John McCain or Ron Paul, and that’s a big problem.
    You will never hear me denigrate actual conservatives on here. I have respect for people with differing views, as long as it’s honest. But if you expect me to call a buffoon anything other than a buffoon, well, I’m sorry… it’s just not going to happen. There are conservatives with honest disagreements on policy, and there are right wing assholes, and they do not deserve equal treatment.

  2. I think that demolishing the nonsense in the Facebook posting is more than adequate without the childish smear about Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter.
    Right now, with a lot of crazies out there unable to actually use the real names of people (how many times do I have to read “King Hussein” as a supposedly-funny takeoff of President Obama?), I would also like to see less use of perjorative slang names. “Caribou Barbie” was funny for about 2 weeks when it first appeared, but continuing to use it really drags the dialogue down to a level that I hoped this site would rise above.